This is an Advertisement (learn more about our advertising)
.
HB 1385 - Wind Energy Pricing JurisdictionIntroduced by Rep. Zaiser, Brandenburg, S. Kelsh Introduced by Sen. Erbele A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact sections 49-02-01.1 and 49-02-03 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to pricing of electricity generated from wind resources.Read the full bill in PDF Format
Introduced: 01/14/05
Last Action: Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 001 nays 088
Final Bill Status:
Failed
Related TopicsThe following is a list of related topics or categories for this bill. Click on the topic title to view more legislation related to the same topic. Public Service Commission, Public Utilities, Wind Energy
Join the HB 1385 - Wind Energy Pricing Jurisdiction Discussion Group
- Start a discussion! - See what others are saying.
There was only one roll call vote on this bill in the
House and the Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 001 nays 088 |
| Percent Voting For Bill | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Republican |
|
0% | |
| Democrat |
|
3.84% |
House / Senate
The following is a breakdown by legislative body:| Percent Voting For Bill | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| House |
|
1.06% | |
| Senate |
|
0% |
East vs. West
Based on the geographic location of the district, we have tallied the votes by "East versus West" (view the East/West District map)| Percent Voting For Bill | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Eastern Districts |
|
2% | |
| Western Districts |
|
0% |
District Votes
The following breaks down the percentage of ND Legislative Districts that were either fully In Support (voted Yea) on this bill, Fully Against (All Voted Nay) or Split (not all members of district agreed)
| Percent Of Districts | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Districts For |
|
0% | |
| Districts Against |
|
91.4% | |
| Districts Split |
|
8.51% |
Demographic Breakdowns
We have gathered statistics on each legislative district and have grouped their votes into a number of categories. These statistics come from US Census Data and you can read more on our classification and grouping methodology here.High Female Populations
| Percent Voting For Bill | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Higher Female Population |
|
4.16% | |
| Lower Female Population |
|
0% |
Low Graduating Rates
| Percent Voting For Bill | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lower Graduation Rate |
|
3.57% | |
| Higher Graduation Rate |
|
0% |
High Native American Population
| Percent Voting For Bill | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| High Native American Population |
|
0% | |
| Low Native American Population |
|
1.16% |
High Manufacturing Sector Jobs
| Percent Voting For Bill | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Higher Manufacturing Employment |
|
0% | |
| Lower Manufacturing Employment |
|
1.31% |
High Divorce Rate
| Percent Voting For Bill | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Higher Divorce Rate |
|
6.25% | |
| Lower Divorce Rate |
|
0% |
High Population in Poverty
| Percent Voting For Bill | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Higher Poverty Rate |
|
0% | |
| Lower Poverty Rate |
|
1.28% |
High Population Over the Age of 62
| Percent Voting For Bill | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Higher 62+ Population |
|
0% | |
| Lower 62+ Population |
|
1.66% |
High Veteran Population
| Percent Voting For Bill | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Higher Veteran Population |
|
0% | |
| Lower Veteran Population |
|
4.16% |
High Rural Population
| Percent Voting For Bill | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Higher Rural Population |
|
0% | |
| Lower Rural Population |
|
2.08% |
Roll Call Votes
The following is a list of House and Senate Roll Call Votes on this bill. The votes are listed in the order
of the legislative day in which the vote was taken. The last two roll call votes normally will show the final status of the bill.
In order for a bill to "pass" it must acheive a Constitutional Majority in both the House and the Senate on th exact same version of the bill. This is why you will see more than two votes on many bills. If either body ammends (adds to) a bill, the vote must be re-taken in both houses.
A "Constitutional Majority" requires that greater than 1/2 of ALL legislators in a body must vote yea. Not just a majority of those present. In the house, this requires a total of 48 votes and in the senate, this requires a total of 24 votes
| Body | Question | Yeas | Nays | Absent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| House | Day 21 -
view the votes... The question being on the final passage of the bill, which has been read, and has committee recommendation of DO NOT PASS, the roll was called and there were 1 YEA, 88 NAYS, 0 EXCUSED, 5 ABSENT AND NOT VOTING |
1 | 88 | 5 |
Recorded Actions
The following is a list of "Recorded Actions" taken on this bill as recorded in the house and senate journals| Date | Body | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 01/14/05 | House | Introduced, first reading, referred Industry, Business and Labor |
| 01/26/05 | House | Committee Hearing 09:00 |
| 01/26/05 | House | Reported back, do not pass, placed on calendar y 014 n 000 |
| 01/27/05 | House | Laid over one legislative day |
| 02/01/05 | House | Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 001 nays 088 |
PRESS RELEASES
Campaigns, Candidates and Organizations - Send your press-releases to press@dakotapolitics.comsign in
| Not registered? - learn more! |
Your County:
{sign in}
Your City:
{sign in}
Your District:
{sign in}
{sign in to see these settings}
|
This is an Advertisement (learn more about our advertising)
Bismarck, ND News | Minot, ND News | Dickinson, ND News | Williston, ND News
DakotaPolitics.com is part of the Midkota Media Network
Free Classified Ads
Bismarck Classifieds
|
Minot Classifieds
|
Williston Classifieds
|
Dickinson Classifieds
|
Jamestown Classifieds
|
Devils Lake Classifieds
|
Fargo Classifieds
Total Outdoor Network
North Dakota Outdoors
|
South Dakota Outdoors
|
Minnesota Outdoors
|
Nebraska Outdoors
|
Alaska Outdoors
Fun and Entertainment Designed and Programmed By Midkota Solutions
